Head to head
Phishunt vs DataNexus MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Public phishing feed: suspicious/confirmed phishing URLs detected hourly. No auth, CC0.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Public data intelligence for AI agents — CVE, compliance, patents, contracts, domains.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Phishunt (91/100 against 73).
| Phishunt | DataNexus MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | B73/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 3 |
| Downloads / week | – | 72 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 11 | 55 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-13 | 2026-07-31 |
| Category | Security | Security |