Head to head
Sticky vs ContextStream MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Persistent memory and context for your agent, on a board you can see. Capped, so it stays small.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (89 and 96 out of 100). ContextStream MCP Server is hosted and callable through the gateway; Sticky runs on your own machine. ContextStream MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| Sticky | ContextStream MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A89/100 | A96/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 43 |
| Downloads / week | 111 | 964 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 2 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-08 | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |