Head to head
Compass by 402rates vs Churnkey
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Read and manage Churnkey cancel flows, retention metrics, and payment recovery
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Churnkey (100/100 against 60). Churnkey has noticeably more public adoption.
| Compass by 402rates | Churnkey | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | A100/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 22 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 11 | — |
| Write actions | 2 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-10 |
| Category | Finance | Finance |