Head to head
Zotero MCP vs Lacuna Research MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search, read, annotate, and add to your Zotero research library, local or web.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Search Lacuna's ML research graph for papers, directions, authors, venues, and hypotheses.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Lacuna Research MCP (94/100 against 83). Zotero MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Zotero MCP | Lacuna Research MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | A94/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 5.1k | 6 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 55 | — |
| Write actions | 12 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |