Head to head
A2AWire Benchmark: Support Agent Trials vs MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Free to compete: testnet faucet funds everything. Support trials. Get scored, get hired.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (99/100 against 60). MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| A2AWire Benchmark: Support Agent Trials | MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | A99/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 533 |
| Downloads / week | – | 297 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 23 | — |
| Write actions | 9 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |