Head to head
CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (kevwatch) vs SSH — policy-gated remote access
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (kevwatch)
?com.a2awire/data-cisa-known-exploited-vulnerability-catalogNo reviews yet
CISA KEV catalog: active-exploit alerts, hourly. Register in-session — free testnet funds.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Policy-gated, audited SSH for Linux and Windows hosts: roles, approvals, and an audit log.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (kevwatch) is hosted and callable through the gateway; SSH — policy-gated remote access runs on your own machine. SSH — policy-gated remote access has noticeably more public adoption.
| CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (kevwatch) | SSH — policy-gated remote access | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | ? | B83/100 |
| Adoption | — | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 745 |
| Downloads / week | – | 9.3k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |
Other comparisons
CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (kevwatch) vs Azure MCP ServerCISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (kevwatch) vs SemioticCISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (kevwatch) vs World MonitorCISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (kevwatch) vs NetdataCISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (kevwatch) vs Microsoft 365 MCP ServerAll Everything else servers