Mmcp.market

Head to head

Dependency Vulnerability Tracker — package security advisories ($0.01/query) vs Sec Nport

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Dependency Vulnerability Tracker — package security advisories ($0.01/query)com.a2awire/data-dependency-vulnerability-malicious-package-security
C
No reviews yet

Dependency vulns & malicious-package advisories. Register in-session — free testnet funds.

Full listing
Sec Nportio.github.pipeworx-io/sec-nport
B
No reviews yet

SEC Form N-PORT — fund and ETF holdings, asked security-first.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Sec Nport (77/100 against 60). Sec Nport has noticeably more public adoption.

 Dependency Vulnerability Tracker — package security advisories ($0.01/query)Sec Nport
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC60/100B77/100
AdoptionNewGrowing
GitHub stars–0
Downloads / week––
Runs whereHosted (remote)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyYesYes
Tools1639
Write actions63
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-19
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

Dependency Vulnerability Tracker — package security advisories ($0.01/query) vs npm Registry MCP ServerDependency Vulnerability Tracker — package security advisories ($0.01/query) vs UpgradeLensDependency Vulnerability Tracker — package security advisories ($0.01/query) vs Security Txt Cra LintDependency Vulnerability Tracker — package security advisories ($0.01/query) vs SwampDependency Vulnerability Tracker — package security advisories ($0.01/query) vs MCP Security & Vulnerability AuditorAll Security servers