Mmcp.market

Head to head

Ui.Vision MCP vs shaft-mcp

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Ui.Vision MCPio.github.A9T9/uivision-mcp
C
No reviews yet

MCP server for browser and desktop automation: OCR, image recognition, real mouse and keyboard input

Full listing
shaft-mcpio.github.ShaftHQ/shaft-mcp
A
No reviews yet

SHAFT browser automation, capture, and offline deterministic failure diagnosis

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours shaft-mcp (90/100 against 69). Ui.Vision MCP has noticeably more public adoption.

 Ui.Vision MCPshaft-mcp
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC69/100A90/100
AdoptionEstablishedGrowing
GitHub stars2.0k410
Downloads / week534–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools24—
Write actions7—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceNOASSERTIONMIT
Last release2026-08-092026-09-19
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

Ui.Vision MCP vs Stealthy Auto BrowseUi.Vision MCP vs FindMeToolUi.Vision MCP vs SeleniumBase MCPUi.Vision MCP vs AIHawkUi.Vision MCP vs SafariAll Scraping and browsing servers