Head to head
Tapp vs Aurora
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Tapp
Aio.github.aarwitz/tappNo reviews yet
Test iOS, Android, and web apps with agent exploration, replayable flows, and CI gates.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Create, edit, preview, and deploy full-stack web apps to a live URL from any MCP client.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Tapp (85/100 against 70). Aurora is hosted and callable through the gateway; Tapp runs on your own machine. Tapp has noticeably more public adoption.
| Tapp | Aurora | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | B70/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 2 | – |
| Downloads / week | 897 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 33 | — |
| Write actions | 4 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |