Head to head
grim-mcp vs TridentChain Security
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Security audit for AI agents: code, deps, exposure, secrets, drift, SBOM, and IoC.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Local supply-chain CVE scanner via OSV/NVD. Scans deps and IDE extensions. No upload.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours TridentChain Security (88/100 against 62). grim-mcp has noticeably more public adoption.
| grim-mcp | TridentChain Security | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C62/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 822 | 25 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 3 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-07-29 |
| Category | Security | Security |