Head to head
grim-mcp vs TrustScan
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Security audit for AI agents: code, deps, exposure, secrets, drift, SBOM, and IoC.
Full listingTrustScan
Cio.github.entradox/trust-scanNo reviews yet
Security scanner for MCP servers and skills: Unicode injection, patterns, secrets.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (62 and 67 out of 100). TrustScan is hosted and callable through the gateway; grim-mcp runs on your own machine. grim-mcp has noticeably more public adoption.
| grim-mcp | TrustScan | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C62/100 | C67/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 1 | – |
| Downloads / week | 822 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 4 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | Security | Security |