Head to head
grim-mcp vs Secobserve
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Security audit for AI agents: code, deps, exposure, secrets, drift, SBOM, and IoC.
Full listing
No reviews yet
MCP server for SecObserve: triage findings, import scan reports and SBOMs, generate VEX.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Secobserve (83/100 against 62).
| grim-mcp | Secobserve | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C62/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 822 | 381 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 19 |
| Write actions | — | 6 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Security | Security |