Head to head
Fish vs NotebookLM MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server exposing the AceDataCloud Fish Audio API (text-to-speech with voice conditioning)
Full listing
No reviews yet
Automate Google NotebookLM — Q&A with citations, audio, video, content generation
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Fish (99/100 against 63). Fish is hosted and callable through the gateway; NotebookLM MCP runs on your own machine. NotebookLM MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Fish | NotebookLM MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A99/100 | C63/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 179 |
| Downloads / week | – | 672 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 42 |
| Write actions | — | 8 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-04 |
| Category | Media | Media |