Mmcp.market

Head to head

Safari vs Figranium MCP

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Safariio.github.achiya-automation/safari-mcp
C
No reviews yet

Native Safari browser automation for AI agents — 98 tools, zero Chrome overhead.

Full listing
Figranium MCPio.github.figranium/figranium-mcp
A
No reviews yet

MCP server for creating, running, inspecting, and scheduling Figranium browser automations.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Figranium MCP (91/100 against 69). Safari has noticeably more public adoption.

 SafariFigranium MCP
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC69/100A91/100
AdoptionEstablishedGrowing
GitHub stars2045
Downloads / week2.6k297
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools—15
Write actions—6
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITApache-2.0
Last release2026-09-182026-09-19
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

Safari vs Agent360 Browser MCPSafari vs Oya BrowserSafari vs mac-control-mcpSafari vs Browser GatewaySafari vs SeleniumBase MCPAll Scraping and browsing servers