Head to head
safari-mcp vs mcp
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Native Safari browser automation for AI agents — 98 tools, zero Chrome overhead.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Reliable web access for AI agents: smart HTTP, rotating proxies, and full-browser rendering.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mcp (81/100 against 69). mcp is hosted and callable through the gateway; safari-mcp runs on your own machine.
| safari-mcp | mcp | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C69/100 | B81/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 203 | 4 |
| Downloads / week | 3.3k | 451 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 4 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |