Head to head
Neuromcp vs Clinicaltrialsgov
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Semantic memory for AI agents with hybrid search, knowledge graph, and consolidation
Full listing
No reviews yet
Search ClinicalTrials.gov — find studies, retrieve results, match patients to eligible trials.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Clinicaltrialsgov (93/100 against 54). Clinicaltrialsgov is hosted and callable through the gateway; Neuromcp runs on your own machine. Clinicaltrialsgov has noticeably more public adoption.
| Neuromcp | Clinicaltrialsgov | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | D54/100 | A93/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 4 | 94 |
| Downloads / week | 289 | 5.7k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 7 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |