Head to head
Agent Browser vs Gateway
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Self-hosted Chrome for AI agents, with a live noVNC view a human can take over.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Durable self for AI agents: one-call resume, memory, real browser, free chat + hire real humans.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (83 and 77 out of 100). Gateway is hosted and callable through the gateway; Agent Browser runs on your own machine.
| Agent Browser | Gateway | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | B77/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 4 | 3 |
| Downloads / week | 45 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 9 | 57 |
| Write actions | — | 7 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |