Head to head
Aethyn Browser vs CloakBrowser MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local Playwright browser through residential proxies — agent picks country + sticky identity
Full listingNo reviews yet
Playwright MCP-compatible browser automation bridge for CloakBrowser Chromium.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours CloakBrowser MCP (83/100 against 60). CloakBrowser MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Aethyn Browser | CloakBrowser MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 3 | 62 |
| Downloads / week | 46 | 428 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 10 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-07-11 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |