Head to head
Search that shows its work vs SearXNG Search
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for SearXNG — privacy-respecting web search with pagination, URL reading
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SearXNG Search (83/100 against 68). SearXNG Search has noticeably more public adoption.
| Search that shows its work | SearXNG Search | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C68/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 1.2k |
| Downloads / week | – | 9.2k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 4 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-09 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |