Mmcp.market

Head to head

agent-exec vs PDF

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

agent-execorg.448c.agent-exec/agent-exec
C
No reviews yet

Accountless pay-per-use sandbox, storage, locks, attestation and handoff. Paid over MCP with x402.

Full listing
PDFio.github.jztan/pdf-mcp
A
No reviews yet

Agentic RAG over one PDF or a whole folder: hybrid search, selective page reads, tables, OCR.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours PDF (85/100 against 56). agent-exec is hosted and callable through the gateway; PDF runs on your own machine. PDF has noticeably more public adoption.

 agent-execPDF
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC56/100A85/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars–136
Downloads / week–1.2k
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools2813
Write actions4—
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-19
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

agent-exec vs Maginaryagent-exec vs BridgeNode MCPagent-exec vs Auscaagent-exec vs Mockserveragent-exec vs Agent CommsAll AI and agents servers