Mmcp.market

Head to head

agent-exec vs MCP Server

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

agent-execio.sslip.128.221.67.45.agent-exec/agent-exec
C
No reviews yet

Accountless pay-per-use sandbox execution, storage, locks, attestation and handoff; pay via x402.

Full listing
MCP Serverio.github.roamzy-io/mcp-server
B
No reviews yet

Agent-native global eSIM: buy for 193 countries, per-MB in USDT/USDC. Agents earn 20% referral.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP Server (78/100 against 60). MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.

 agent-execMCP Server
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC60/100B78/100
AdoptionNewGrowing
GitHub stars–3
Downloads / week–456
Runs whereHosted (remote)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyYesYes
Tools312
Write actions12
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-07
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

agent-exec vs Maginaryagent-exec vs BridgeNode MCPagent-exec vs Auscaagent-exec vs MCPagent-exec vs Trusty SquireAll AI and agents servers