Head to head
Gateway vs Web Scraper
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Durable self for AI agents: one-call resume, memory, real browser, free chat + hire real humans.
Full listing
No reviews yet
10 pay-per-call web tools: markdown, CSS scrape, links, crawl, screenshot, PDF, browser.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Web Scraper (88/100 against 77).
| Gateway | Web Scraper | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B77/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 3 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 57 | 11 |
| Write actions | 7 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-11 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |