Head to head
Secret Scan vs Husk
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Secret Scan
Bio.github.agentic-income-bot/mcp-secret-scanNo reviews yet
Check text for leaked credentials before an agent writes or commits it. Runs locally.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Local-first defensive scanner for vulnerable dependencies, leaked secrets, and risky agent configs
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Husk (91/100 against 83). Husk has noticeably more public adoption.
| Secret Scan | Husk | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 6 |
| Downloads / week | – | 72 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-12 | 2026-09-14 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |