Head to head
Aginx Browser vs mcp
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Stealth web browser for agents: search, fetch, click, download and type in persistent MCP sessions.
Full listing
No reviews yet
MCP server with WebdriverIO for browser and mobile app automation (iOS/Android via Appium)
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mcp (86/100 against 73). Aginx Browser is hosted and callable through the gateway; mcp runs on your own machine.
| Aginx Browser | mcp | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B73/100 | A86/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 30 | 39 |
| Downloads / week | – | 5.3k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 37 | — |
| Write actions | 6 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |