Head to head
Web Scraper vs PyreCrawl
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
10 pay-per-call web tools: markdown, CSS scrape, links, crawl, screenshot, PDF, browser.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Web scraping + research toolkit for AI agents: scrape, crawl, monitor URLs with anti-bot bypass.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (88 and 92 out of 100). Web Scraper is hosted and callable through the gateway; PyreCrawl runs on your own machine. PyreCrawl has noticeably more public adoption.
| Web Scraper | PyreCrawl | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 16 |
| Downloads / week | – | 153 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 11 | 13 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-11 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |