Mmcp.market

Head to head

Ainative Zerodb Memory vs Local

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Ainative Zerodb Memoryio.github.AINative-Studio/ainative-zerodb-memory-mcp
A
No reviews yet

ZeroDB agent-memory MCP — 18 tools: memory + write-back to Slack, Gmail, Calendar, GitHub.

Full listing
Localcom.local-mcp/local-mcp
C
No reviews yet

Let ChatGPT, Claude & Cursor use your Mac: email, calendar, iMessage, Teams, files. Local, free.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Ainative Zerodb Memory (89/100 against 68). Local is hosted and callable through the gateway; Ainative Zerodb Memory runs on your own machine. Local has noticeably more public adoption.

 Ainative Zerodb MemoryLocal
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA89/100C68/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars155
Downloads / week892.0k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools18—
Write actions6—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITNOASSERTION
Last release2026-08-012026-09-19
CategoryEmailEmail

Other comparisons