Head to head
AIsa Web Search & Research vs Groundhog
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Web search and page extraction across several independent search providers.
Full listingGroundhog
Aio.github.dmytrome/groundhog-mcpNo reviews yet
Search, read and research the web, with hidden text stripped by default and sources hashed
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Groundhog (92/100 against 70). AIsa Web Search & Research is hosted and callable through the gateway; Groundhog runs on your own machine. Groundhog has noticeably more public adoption.
| AIsa Web Search & Research | Groundhog | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B70/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 203 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |