Head to head
Human Standards vs Codesign
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Read-only Human Standards guidance for accessible, usable interface design.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Local design engine for AI agents: create, edit and export real, editable designs.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 89 out of 100). Codesign has noticeably more public adoption.
| Human Standards | Codesign | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 3 | 33 |
| Downloads / week | 27 | 6.9k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 5 | 5 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-03 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Media | Media |