Head to head
CiteNexus vs Disney Lorcana MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search scholarly sources, verify references, and export citations with traceable evidence.
Full listingNo reviews yet
MCP server for Disney Lorcana TCG: card search, deck validation, stats, and deck import/export
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Disney Lorcana MCP (92/100 against 83).
| CiteNexus | Disney Lorcana MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | 210 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 11 | 10 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |