Head to head
CiteNexus vs OpenQFR
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search scholarly sources, verify references, and export citations with traceable evidence.
Full listingOpenQFR
Bio.github.openqfr-dev/openqfrNo reviews yet
Search machine-readable quantitative strategy failure evidence before repeating failed research.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (83 and 84 out of 100). OpenQFR is hosted and callable through the gateway; CiteNexus runs on your own machine.
| CiteNexus | OpenQFR | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | B84/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 210 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 11 | 3 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-09 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |