Head to head
Healthclaw Guardrails vs spintax.net MCP server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Guardrailed FHIR access for AI agents: PHI redaction, audit trail, step-up auth, tenant isolation
Full listing
No reviews yet
Write, validate, render and analyze spintax templates. Backed by @spintax/core. No auth.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (87 and 92 out of 100).
| Healthclaw Guardrails | spintax.net MCP server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A87/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 30 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | – | 441 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 4 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-25 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Security | Security |