Mmcp.market

Head to head

Depot (depot.dev) vs CinderRoute Agentic CI Operations

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Depot (depot.dev)io.github.akshayjain3450/depot-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Read-only MCP server for Depot (depot.dev): CI failure diagnosis, build forensics, and usage.

Full listing
CinderRoute Agentic CI Operationsdev.cinderroute/agentic-ci-operations
C
No reviews yet

Agentic CI operations for build inspection, failure diagnosis, and runner troubleshooting.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Depot (depot.dev) (83/100 against 60). CinderRoute Agentic CI Operations is hosted and callable through the gateway; Depot (depot.dev) runs on your own machine. Depot (depot.dev) has noticeably more public adoption.

 Depot (depot.dev)CinderRoute Agentic CI Operations
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB83/100C60/100
AdoptionGrowingNew
GitHub stars1
Downloads / week55
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools438
Write actions102
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceNOASSERTION
Last release2026-09-19
CategoryDeveloper toolsDeveloper tools

Other comparisons