Head to head
Contextforge vs uploads.sh
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Host files from coding agents; stage on a branch and attach to GitHub PRs.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours uploads.sh (92/100 against 83). uploads.sh is hosted and callable through the gateway; Contextforge runs on your own machine. uploads.sh has noticeably more public adoption.
| Contextforge | uploads.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 2 | 19 |
| Downloads / week | 59 | 449 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 69 | — |
| Write actions | 25 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-04 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |