Head to head
Microsoft SQL Server vs Supabase
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Read-only-by-default SQL Server: schema, parameterized SELECT, execution plans; writes opt-in.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Supabase (100/100 against 73). Supabase is hosted and callable through the gateway; Microsoft SQL Server runs on your own machine. Supabase has noticeably more public adoption.
| Microsoft SQL Server | Supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B73/100 | A100/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | 9 | 2.9k |
| Downloads / week | – | 76k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |