Head to head
Amass vs Wikipedia
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Linked life-science search: 40M+ papers, 1.2M+ trials, drugs, genes, FDA/EMA approvals, patents.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Search Wikipedia, read summaries and full text, target sections, find nearby pages, list languages.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (97 and 93 out of 100).
| Amass | Wikipedia | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A97/100 | A93/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 3 |
| Downloads / week | – | 396 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 6 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |