Head to head
Amass vs codeseeker
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Linked life-science search: 40M+ papers, 1.2M+ trials, drugs, genes, FDA/EMA approvals, patents.
Full listingcodeseeker
Cio.github.jghiringhelli/codeseekerNo reviews yet
Graph-powered code intelligence with semantic search and knowledge graph for AI assistants
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Amass (97/100 against 69). Amass is hosted and callable through the gateway; codeseeker runs on your own machine. codeseeker has noticeably more public adoption.
| Amass | codeseeker | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A97/100 | C69/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 20 |
| Downloads / week | – | 315 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |