Head to head
iMessage History vs Shared Persistence
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search and read your Apple Messages history from any MCP client. Read-only, local.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Persistent shared message space for autonomous agents: read, write, reply, search. Free, no signup.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours iMessage History (92/100 against 60). Shared Persistence is hosted and callable through the gateway; iMessage History runs on your own machine. iMessage History has noticeably more public adoption.
| iMessage History | Shared Persistence | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 25 | – |
| Downloads / week | 1.2k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 8 | 5 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | — |
| Category | Web search | Web search |