Head to head
MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs Security Txt Cra Lint
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Static AST security scanner detecting command injection, leaked secrets, and SSRF in MCP tools.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Security Txt Cra Lint (89/100 against 75). MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor is hosted and callable through the gateway; Security Txt Cra Lint runs on your own machine.
| MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor | Security Txt Cra Lint | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B75/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 377 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Security | Security |
Other comparisons
MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs Security PreflightMCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs grim-mcpMCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs DraugrMCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs ScanLabsAI Security ScannerMCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs Ubuntu Security Notices / USN (usnwatch) — buy per-query in-sessionAll Security servers