Mmcp.market

Head to head

SEO Tools: A-Parser bridge vs webfetch

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

SEO Tools: A-Parser bridgeio.github.antohins/seo-tools-mcp-aparser
B
No reviews yet

Bridge to a self-hosted A-Parser: SERP, suggests and 150+ parsers via its API (read-only).

Full listing
webfetchio.github.firish/webfetch
B
No reviews yet

Self-hosted web search for LLM agents: search -> fetch -> rank pipeline with semantic caching

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SEO Tools: A-Parser bridge (83/100 against 71).

 SEO Tools: A-Parser bridgewebfetch
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB83/100B71/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars356
Downloads / week3518
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools115
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-182026-07-23
CategorySEOSEO

Other comparisons

SEO Tools: A-Parser bridge vs NotipoSEO Tools: A-Parser bridge vs GoAnyAPI MCPSEO Tools: A-Parser bridge vs SEO DataSEO Tools: A-Parser bridge vs Yandex SearchSEO Tools: A-Parser bridge vs GlasserAll SEO servers