Head to head
PostgreSQL vs Lathe
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for PostgreSQL: local, Docker, RDS, Neon, Supabase, or behind an SSH bastion.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Managed Postgres, Redis, CouchDB and NATS on a dedicated EU machine, one flat price.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours PostgreSQL (83/100 against 70). Lathe is hosted and callable through the gateway; PostgreSQL runs on your own machine. PostgreSQL has noticeably more public adoption.
| PostgreSQL | Lathe | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | B70/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 22 | – |
| Downloads / week | 2.9k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 6 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | — |
| Category | Databases | Databases |