Mmcp.market

Head to head

PostgreSQL vs DB Access

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

PostgreSQLio.github.antonorlov/mcp-postgres-server
B
No reviews yet

MCP server for PostgreSQL: local, Docker, RDS, Neon, Supabase, or behind an SSH bastion.

Full listing
DB Accessio.github.Rheopyrin/db-access-mcp
A
No reviews yet

MCP server for Postgres/MySQL/Redshift/SQL Server over SSH/SSM tunnels with secret providers.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours DB Access (92/100 against 83). PostgreSQL has noticeably more public adoption.

 PostgreSQLDB Access
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB83/100A92/100
AdoptionEstablishedGrowing
GitHub stars220
Downloads / week2.9k53
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools6—
Write actions1—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-162026-09-07
CategoryDatabasesDatabases

Other comparisons

PostgreSQL vs NeonPostgreSQL vs PostgreSQL MCP ServerPostgreSQL vs Postgres AIopsPostgreSQL vs health4aiPostgreSQL vs SupabaseAll Databases servers