Head to head
PostgreSQL vs Huntress MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for PostgreSQL: local, Docker, RDS, Neon, Supabase, or behind an SSH bastion.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Every Huntress endpoint, plus a local SQLite mirror that delivers fleet-wide incident, coverage
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. PostgreSQL has noticeably more public adoption.
| PostgreSQL | Huntress MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | ? |
| Adoption | Established | — |
| GitHub stars | 22 | – |
| Downloads / week | 2.9k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | — |
| Category | Databases | Databases |