Head to head
Agent Mandate Verification vs Ausca
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Verify a proposed action against a signed Agent Mandate without executing or mutating accounts.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Pay-per-call APIs and MCP services for agents, no accounts or keys, with verifiable receipts.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (82 and 84 out of 100). Ausca is hosted and callable through the gateway; Agent Mandate Verification runs on your own machine. Ausca has noticeably more public adoption.
| Agent Mandate Verification | Ausca | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B82/100 | B84/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 15 |
| Downloads / week | 352 | 220 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 14 |
| Write actions | — | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |