Head to head
DOMShell vs KittyClaw
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Drive Chrome with filesystem commands (ls, cd, grep, click, type). One MCP tool, multi-agent.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Drive KittyClaw, a self-hosted agent-fleet kanban, from any MCP client (embedded /mcp endpoint).
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours DOMShell (88/100 against 68).
| DOMShell | KittyClaw | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | C68/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 53 | 26 |
| Downloads / week | 176 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 39 | — |
| Write actions | 4 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | 2026-08-14 | 2026-09-06 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |