Head to head
Vendor Status vs Trips
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Live status-page map for 1,127 SaaS/cloud vendors plus 15,418 historical incidents.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Hand someone a complete trip as a private, editable map link. No account, no API key, no card.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Trips (85/100 against 60). Trips is hosted and callable through the gateway; Vendor Status runs on your own machine. Trips has noticeably more public adoption.
| Vendor Status | Trips | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | A85/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 277 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 6 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-13 |
| Category | Maps and travel | Maps and travel |