Head to head
MCP vs gflow-cli
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Manage Appwrite projects, databases, auth, storage, functions, and messaging; search Appwrite docs
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (99 and 92 out of 100). MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; gflow-cli runs on your own machine. MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP | gflow-cli | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A99/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 73 | 216 |
| Downloads / week | 24k | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 16 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |