Head to head
MCP vs artifact-site
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Manage Appwrite projects, databases, auth, storage, functions, and messaging; search Appwrite docs
Full listing
No reviews yet
One place for every AI agent's pages and docs: versioned links to share, search and update.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (99 and 98 out of 100). MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP | artifact-site | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A99/100 | A98/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 73 | 14 |
| Downloads / week | 24k | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-24 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |