Head to head
MCP vs Sema
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Manage Appwrite projects, databases, auth, storage, functions, and messaging; search Appwrite docs
Full listing
No reviews yet
MCP tools for Sema — eval, compile, build, format, and docs for a Lisp with LLM primitives.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (99/100 against 78). MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; Sema runs on your own machine. MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP | Sema | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A99/100 | B78/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 73 | 51 |
| Downloads / week | 24k | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-09 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |