Head to head
mcp vs Obsidian Turbocharged
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Manage Appwrite projects, databases, auth, storage, functions, and messaging; search Appwrite docs
Full listingObsidian Turbocharged
Cio.github.The-40-Thieves/obsidian-tcNo reviews yet
Model-agnostic, agent-ready Obsidian MCP server with RBAC, SLSA provenance, and native search.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mcp (99/100 against 65). mcp is hosted and callable through the gateway; Obsidian Turbocharged runs on your own machine.
| mcp | Obsidian Turbocharged | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A99/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 73 | 5 |
| Downloads / week | – | 757 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |