Head to head
site-spec vs MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server: audit any website for SEO, accessibility, and AI-searchability, then auto-fix it.
Full listing
No reviews yet
MCP connector for Liftaven SEO research, connected search reports and reviewed website proposals.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP Server (96/100 against 85). MCP Server is hosted and callable through the gateway; site-spec runs on your own machine.
| site-spec | MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | A96/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 28 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 4 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-11 | 2026-09-22 |
| Category | SEO | SEO |